Correlation between visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in early cataract and glaucoma. A comparative cross-sectional study Original research study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The study investigates the correlation between visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with early cataracts and glaucoma, comparing these findings with a control group. This aims to identify visual impairments associated with each condition to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of 213 patients using non-probability consecutive sampling included 75 with early cataracts, 75 with early glaucoma, and 63 controls, all with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥1.0 logMAR. Pre-dilation assessments included medical history, glaucoma status, and lens opacification; BCVA was recorded post-refraction. CS was measured with the MARS chart at 1 m. Data were analysed using SPSS version 21.
Results: Glaucomatous eyes showed mean VA of 0.72 (±0.85) (right eye) and 0.86 (±1.02) (left eye), with CS of 0 (±0) and 4 (±5) respectively. A strong negative correlation was observed between VA and CS in glaucomatous (r = -0.69; p <0.001) and cataract eyes (r = -0.71; p <0.001). Glaucomatous eyes significantly differed in VA from controls: mean 0.45 (±0.28), Z score 7.6; p <0.001, as did cataract eyes: mean 0.4 (±0.3), Z score -5.8; p <0.001. CS in glaucomatous eyes deviated significantly: mean 0.84 (±0.33), Z score -9.05; p <0.001, as did cataract eyes: mean 0.89 (±0.3), Z score -8.63; p <0.001.
Conclusion: Both glaucomatous and cataract eyes showed negative correl
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)
References
2. Daiber HF, Gnugnoli DM. Visual Acuity. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) 2025 Jan-. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563298/.
3. Owsley C, McGwin Jr G. Vision and driving. Vision Res. 2010; 50(23): 2348-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021.
4. Kniestedt C, Stamper RL. Visual acuity and its measurement. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2003; 16(2): 155-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-1549 (03)00013-0.
5. Kaur K, Gurnani B. Contrast Sensitivity. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580542/.
6. Dougherty BE, Flom RE, Bullimore MA. An evaluation of the Mars letter contrast sensitivity test. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82(11): 970-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000187844.27025.
7. Wood LJ, Jolly JK, Buckley TM et al. Low luminance visual acuity as a clinical measure and clinical trial outcome measure: a scoping review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021; 41(2): 213-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12775.
8. Butt T, Patel PJ, Tufail A et al. Modelling cost effectiveness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the impact of using contrast sensitivity vs. visual acuity. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014; 12(3): 289-97.
9. McKendrick AM, Sampson GP, Walland MJ et al. Contrast sensitivity changes due to glaucoma and normal aging: low-spatial-frequency losses in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(5): 2115-22. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-1208.
10. Ahmad A, Sughra U, Habib MK et al. Contrast sensitivity improvement with yellow filter in low vision patients. Middle East. 2017; 95: 2.
11. Sarngal B, Koul A, Kailwoo SK. Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Field Loss in Patients with Glaucoma. JK Sci. 2013; 15(4): 174.
12. Richman J, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D et al. Importance of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010; 128(12): 1576-82. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.275.
13. Maraini G, Rosmini F, Graziosi P et al. Influence of type and severity of pure forms of age-related cataract on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Italian American Cataract Study Group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35: 262-7.
14. Sample PA, Juang PS, Weinreb RN. Isolating the effects of primary open-angle glaucoma on the contrast sensitivity function. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991; 112(3): 308-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394 (14)76732-7.
15. Cedrún-Sánchez JE, Moreira-Estebaranz C, Remis-Gonzalez M et al. Relationships between mesopic visual sensitivity and macular inner and outer retinal layer thickness in healthy younger, middle-aged and older adults. Acta Ophthalmology (Copenh). 2024; 102(4): e500-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15790.
16. Mehta J, Czanner G, Harding S et al. Visual risk factors for falls in older adults: a case-control study. BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22(1): 134.