Microneedle fractional radiofrequency for reducing upper eyelid skin laxity: characteristics and comparison with other techniques Review article
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the study was to present microneedle fractional radiofrequency as a method for reducing upper eyelid skin laxity and to compare it with other treatment techniques, both non-invasive and surgical. The article discusses the mechanism of action, technical parameters, clinical effects, and safety profile of microneedle radiofrequency. A comparative analysis with surgical blepharoplasty, fractional CO2 laser, HIFU, plasma, mesotherapy, and fillers was performed. The results showed that microneedle fractional radiofrequency is an effective and safe alternative for patients with mild to moderate upper eyelid skin laxity, offering visible improvement without a long recovery period. Although, surgical blepharoplasty remains the most effective method in advanced cases, non-invasive techniques are becoming increasingly important due to technological advances and growing patient expectations regarding comfort and procedural safety.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)
References
2. Cahill KV, Bradley EA, Meyer DR et al. Functional indications for upper eyelid ptosis and blepharoplasty surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(12): 2510-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.029.
3. Nowak A, Nowak A, Bogusz K et al. Fractional microneedle radiofrequency – mechanism of action and assessment of safety, effectiveness in the treatment, and possible side effects based on a review of scientific literature. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2023; 21(1): 106-14. https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2023.21.01.011.
4. Yokoyama Y, Akita H, Hasegawa S et al. Histologic study of collagen and stem cells after radiofrequency treatment for aging skin. Dermatologic Surgery. 2014; 40(4): 390-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12443.
5. Tehrani L, Tashjian M, Mayrovitz HN. Physiological mechanisms and therapeutic applications of microneedling: A narrative review. Cureus. 2025; 17(3): e80510. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80510.
6. Fan X, Liu L-H, Alexiades-Armenakas M et al. Histological and electron microscopic analysis of fractional micro-plasma radio-frequency technology effects. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013; 12(11): 1210-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12443.
7. Delgado AR, Chapas, AM. Introduction and overview of radiofrequency treatments in aesthetic dermatology. J Cosmetic Dermatol. 2022; 21(Suppl. 1): S1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15026.
8. Elman M, Harth Y. Novel multi source phase controlled radiofrequency technology for non ablative and micro ablative treatment of wrinkles, lax skin and acne scars. Laser Ther. 2011; 20(4): 205-12.
9. Magro I, Kochhar A, Arnaoutakis D et al. Transcutaneous radiofrequency microneedling in the facial plastic surgeon’s practice: A review. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022; 24(S): S3-10. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2022.0226.
10. Duncan DI, Kreindel M. Basic radiofrequency: Physics and safety and application to aesthetic medicine. In: Radiofrequency in Cosmetic Dermatology. Volume 2. Lapidoth WM, Halachmi S. (eds.). Karger, 2014: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362747.
11. Nowak A, Nowak A, Bogusz K et al. Fractional microneedle radiofrequency – mechanism of action and assessment of safety, effectiveness in the treatment, and possible side effects based on a review of scientific literature. J Educ Health Sport. 2023; 21(1): 106-14. https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2023.21.01.011.
12. Juszkat R, Pukacki F, Zieliński M et al. Ultrasound evaluation of vascular thrombotic complications following endovascular implantation of cardiac pacemaker electrodes. Acta Angiologica. 2006; 12(1): 1-6.