Zastosowanie tomografii komputerowej naczyń wieńcowych w nowoczesnej diagnostyce choroby wieńcowej Artykuł przeglądowy
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Opublikowane:
wrz 30, 2010
Słowa kluczowe:
tomografia komputerowa naczyń wieńcowych, koronarografia, choroba wieńcowa
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstrakt
W artykule przedstawiono możliwości, jakie daje zastosowanie tomografii komputerowej w diagnostyce i prognozowaniu dalszego postępowania u pacjentów z objawową lub bezobjawową chorobą wieńcową, oraz jej rolę w porównaniu z klasyczną koronarografią.
Pobrania
Dane pobrania nie są jeszcze dostepne
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Jak cytować
Wilczko , J. (2010). Zastosowanie tomografii komputerowej naczyń wieńcowych w nowoczesnej diagnostyce choroby wieńcowej . Kardiologia W Praktyce, 4(3), 105-110. Pobrano z https://www.journalsmededu.pl/index.php/kwp/article/view/1630
Numer
Dział
Artykuły
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Copyright: © Medical Education sp. z o.o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)
Bibliografia
1. Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G., Kuntz K.M., Douglas P.S.: Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2002, 9: 133-134.
2. Heijenbrok-Kal M.H., Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G.: Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am. Heart J. 2007, 154: 415-423.
3. Kuntz K.M., Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G., Douglas P.S.: Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130: 709-718.
4. Bluemke D.A., Achenbach S., Budoff M. et al.: Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008, 118: 586-606.
5. Schroeder S., Kopp A.F., Baumbach A. et al.: Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37: 1430-1435.
6. Schroeder S., Kopp A.F., Ohnesorge B. et al.: Virtual coronary angioscopy using multislice computed tomography. Heart 2002, 87: 205-209.
7. Greenland P., Abrams J., Aurigemma G.P. et al.: Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation 2000, 101: E16-22.
8. Gibbons R.J., Balady G.J., Bricker J.T. et al.: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002, 106: 1883-1892.
9. Ammann P., Brunner-La Rocca H.P., Angehrn W. et al.: Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator’s experience and the catheter size. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2003, 59: 13-18.
10. Batyraliev T., Ayalp M.R., Sercelik A. et al.: Complications of cardiac catheterization: a single-center study. Angiology 2005, 56: 75-80.
11. Chandrasekar B., Doucet S., Bilodeau L. et al.: Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a single-center experience. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2001, 52: 289-295.
12. Arnett E.N., Isner J.M., Redwood D.R. et al.: Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann. Intern. Med. 1979, 91: 350-356.
13. Marcus M.L., Skorton D.J., Johnson M.R. et al.: Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: „a battered gold standard”. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1988, 11: 882–885.
14. Kern M.J.: Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 2000, 101: 1344-1351.
15. Eagle K.A., Guyton R.A., Davidoff R. et al.: ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation 2004, 110: 1168-1176.
16. Smith S.C. Jr., Feldman T.E., Hirshfeld J.W. Jr. et al.: ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention – summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006, 113: 156-175.
17. Little W.C., Constantinescu M., Applegate R.J. et al.: Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation 1988, 78 (5 Pt 1): 1157-1166.
18. Szczeklik A., Tandera M.: Kardiologia – podręcznik oparty na zasadach EBM. Medycyna Praktyczna 2009: 130.
19. Miller J.M. et al.: Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359: 2324-2336.
20. Stein P.D., Yaekoub A.Y., Matta F., Sostman H.D.: 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am. J. Med. 2008, 121: 715-725.
21. Meijboom W.B., Meijs M.F., Schuijf J.D. et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52: 2135-2144.
22. Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M. et al.: Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359: 2324-2336.
2. Heijenbrok-Kal M.H., Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G.: Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am. Heart J. 2007, 154: 415-423.
3. Kuntz K.M., Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G., Douglas P.S.: Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130: 709-718.
4. Bluemke D.A., Achenbach S., Budoff M. et al.: Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008, 118: 586-606.
5. Schroeder S., Kopp A.F., Baumbach A. et al.: Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37: 1430-1435.
6. Schroeder S., Kopp A.F., Ohnesorge B. et al.: Virtual coronary angioscopy using multislice computed tomography. Heart 2002, 87: 205-209.
7. Greenland P., Abrams J., Aurigemma G.P. et al.: Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation 2000, 101: E16-22.
8. Gibbons R.J., Balady G.J., Bricker J.T. et al.: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002, 106: 1883-1892.
9. Ammann P., Brunner-La Rocca H.P., Angehrn W. et al.: Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator’s experience and the catheter size. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2003, 59: 13-18.
10. Batyraliev T., Ayalp M.R., Sercelik A. et al.: Complications of cardiac catheterization: a single-center study. Angiology 2005, 56: 75-80.
11. Chandrasekar B., Doucet S., Bilodeau L. et al.: Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a single-center experience. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2001, 52: 289-295.
12. Arnett E.N., Isner J.M., Redwood D.R. et al.: Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann. Intern. Med. 1979, 91: 350-356.
13. Marcus M.L., Skorton D.J., Johnson M.R. et al.: Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: „a battered gold standard”. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1988, 11: 882–885.
14. Kern M.J.: Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 2000, 101: 1344-1351.
15. Eagle K.A., Guyton R.A., Davidoff R. et al.: ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation 2004, 110: 1168-1176.
16. Smith S.C. Jr., Feldman T.E., Hirshfeld J.W. Jr. et al.: ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention – summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006, 113: 156-175.
17. Little W.C., Constantinescu M., Applegate R.J. et al.: Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation 1988, 78 (5 Pt 1): 1157-1166.
18. Szczeklik A., Tandera M.: Kardiologia – podręcznik oparty na zasadach EBM. Medycyna Praktyczna 2009: 130.
19. Miller J.M. et al.: Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359: 2324-2336.
20. Stein P.D., Yaekoub A.Y., Matta F., Sostman H.D.: 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am. J. Med. 2008, 121: 715-725.
21. Meijboom W.B., Meijs M.F., Schuijf J.D. et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52: 2135-2144.
22. Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M. et al.: Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359: 2324-2336.