Jak dziś leczyć powikłane nadciśnienie tętnicze? Artykuł przeglądowy

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Izabela Łoń
Agnieszka Kuch-Wocial
Monika Maciejewska

Abstrakt

Dane przedstawione w niniejszym rozdziale oparto na zaleceniach ekspertów ESC i ESH z roku 2007, dotyczących leczenia nadciśnienia tętniczego ze współistniejącymi chorobami układu sercowo-naczyniowego, cukrzycą i chorobami nerek. Autorzy skupili się na praktycznych aspektach terapii i wynikających z najnowszych badań zmianach, jakie należy uwzględnić, chcąc nowocześnie i prawidłowo leczyć chorych z nadciśnieniem i chorobami takimi, jak: udar mózgu, cukrzyca, niewydolność nerek, choroba niedokrwienna serca, przewlekła niewydolność krążenia czy migotanie przedsionków.

Pobrania

Dane pobrania nie są jeszcze dostepne

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Jak cytować
Łoń , I., Kuch-Wocial, A., & Maciejewska , M. (2007). Jak dziś leczyć powikłane nadciśnienie tętnicze? . Kardiologia W Praktyce, 1(4), 172-178. Pobrano z https://www.journalsmededu.pl/index.php/kwp/article/view/1700
Dział
Artykuły

Bibliografia

1. Guidelines Commitee: 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension The Task Force for Menagement of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Journal of Hypertension 2007, 25:1105-1187.
2. PROGRESS Collaborative Study Group: Randomized trial of perindopril based blood pressure-lowering regimen among 6108 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2001, 358:1033-1041.
3. Arima H., Chalmers J., Woodward M. et al., PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke, the PROGRESS trial. J. Hypertens. 2006, 24:1201-1208.
4. Schrader J., Luders S., Kulschewski A. et al.: Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke. Eprosartan compared with Nitrendypine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomised controlled study (MOSES). Stroke 2005, 36:1218-1226.
5. Trenkwalder P., Elmfeldt D., Hofman A. et al.: The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE). The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) - major cardiovascular events and stroke in subgroups of patients. Blood Press 2005, 14:31-37.
6. Hansson L., Zanchetti A., Carruthers S.G. et al.: Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet 1998, 351:1755-1762.
7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in Type 2 diabetes. UKPDS38. BMJ 1998, 317:703-713.
8. Schrier R.W., Estacio R.O., Esler A. et al.: Effects of aggressive blood pressure control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients on albuminuria, retinopathy and stroke. Kidney Int. 2002, 61:1086-1097.
9. Segura J., Ruilope L.M., Zanchetti A.: On the importance of estimating renal function for cardiovascular risk assessment. J. Hypertens. 2004, 22:1635-1639.
10. Levey A.S., Greene T., Beck G.J. et al.: Dietary protein restriction and the progression of chronic renal disease: what have all of the results of the MDRD study shown? Modification of diet in renal disease study group. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999, 10:2426-2439.
11. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study investigators: Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICROHOPE substudy. Lancet 2000, 355:253-259.
12. Brenner B.M., Cooper M.E., de Zeeuw D. et al., RENAAL Study Investigators: Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345:861-869.
13. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. The GISEN Group (Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia). Lancet 1997, 349:1857-1863.
14. Mann J.F., Gerstein H.C., Yi Q.L. et al. HOPE Investigators: Progression of renal insufficiency in type 2 diabetes with and without microalbuminuria: results of the Heart Outcomes and Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) randomized study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003, 42:936-942.
15. Ruggenenti P., Fassi A., Ilieva A.P. et al., Nephrologic Diabetes Complications Trial (BENEDICT) Investigators: Preventing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351:1941-1951.
16. Mogensen C.E., Viberti G., Halimi S. et al., (PREMIER) Study Group: Effect of lowdose perindopril/indapamide on albuminuria in diabetes: Preterax in albuminuria regression: PREMIER. Hypertension 2003, 41:1063-1071.
17. Nakao N., Yoshimura A., Morita H. et al.: Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in nondiabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003, 361:117-124.
18. MacKinnon M., Shurraw S., Akbari A. et al.: Combination therapy with an angiotensin receptor blocker and an ACE inhibitor in proteinuric renal disease: a systematic review of the efficacy and safety data. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2006, 48: 8-20.
19. Julius S., Nesbitt S.D., Egan B.M. et al., Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) Study Investigators: Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N. Engl. J. Med, 2006: 354: 1685-1697.
20. Stanowisko American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research oraz Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention. Hypertension (wydanie polskie) 2007, 3:260-290.
21. Pepine C.J., Kowey P.R., Kupfer S. et al., INVEST Investigators: Predictors of adverse outcome among patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47:547-551.
22. Nissen S.E., Tuzcu E.M., Libby P., et al., CAMELOTT Investigators: Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 292:2217-2226.
23. Berl T., Hunsicker L.G., Lewis J.B. et al.: Impact of achiebved blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16:2170-2179.
24. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group: Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002, 288:2981-2997.
25. Shekelle P.G., Rich MW, Morton SC, et al.: Efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers in the management of left ventricular systolic dysfunction according to race, gender, and diabetic status: a meta-analysis of major clinical trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003, 41:1529-1538.
26. Pfeffer M.A., McMurray J.J., Velazquez E.J. et al., Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators: Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349:1893-1896.
27. Freemantle N., Cleland J., Young P. et al.: Beta blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. Br. Med. Journal 1999, 318:1730-1737.
28. Madrid A.H., Bueno M.G., Rebollo J.M. et al.: Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with longlasting persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study. Circulation 2002, 106:331-336.
29. Fogari R., Mugellini A., Destro M. et al.: Losartan and prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive patients. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2006, 47:46-50.